FM3
#1
Posted 31 January 2007 - 09:04 PM
Also is an FM3 really necessary to move to Rosarito? I would be commuting to SD mon- fri to go to work. My kids( I have 3 ) and I will be making the move in March. I was just wondering if I really needed that to move over there? Or can I move and then work on getting the FM3 while I am residing in Rosarito? Help Please, also what is the cost, do I have to buy one for each person in the family
#2
Posted 01 February 2007 - 12:32 AM
live but not to work.
#3
Posted 01 February 2007 - 12:42 AM
I say it is up to you whether you want to obtain it immediately or at a later date.
I am, however, currently working with the Consulado Mexicano in SD to obtain citizenship for Mexico as my mom is from there.
"YO heart BC"
#4
Posted 03 February 2007 - 04:39 AM
#6
Posted 04 February 2007 - 03:34 PM
#8
Posted 05 February 2007 - 07:44 PM
#9
Posted 02 May 2007 - 03:33 AM
#10
Posted 06 May 2007 - 02:49 AM
#11
Posted 14 December 2007 - 07:50 PM
How about next summer you renew it early? Just a thought.
#12
Posted 14 December 2007 - 09:12 PM
You can get a new one without renewing and not pay any fine. But you lose any time built up in country if you are trying for citizenship or something.
The expiration dates are fixed as far as I know. I don't think there's any requirement to renew it in the same place every time. I got mine at the San Diego Consulate and they said they can only issue new ones, not renew them.
#13
Posted 19 December 2007 - 07:31 PM
One may have to pay a penalty for that.
On another note, it would seem incredibly stupid that one must renew their FM3 at only the original issuing location.
Then again, what would be new with such ridiculous & inconveniences requirements, right ? :roll: :x Hope that isn't the case here though.
#14
Posted 20 December 2007 - 01:08 PM
#15
Posted 20 December 2007 - 07:59 PM
Another question might be -- When is the earliest one can apply for renewal before the expiration date of their FM3 ? Maybe 2 weeks, 1 or 2 months ?
I might want to leave the country around that time and perhaps have them hold it or have somebody else pick it up for me. May not be do able . . .. .
Regarding MX citizenship -- Would US citizens of non-Hispanic origin have to give up their US citizenship ? I don't believe that most US born citizens are afforded the same luxury of holding dual citizenships as those US citizens born abroad.
If the only reason to change one's citizenship is property ownership without paying the annual fideicomiso fees, it could be thought of as a very serious decision. Are there other reasons making it worth doing so ?
#16
Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:43 PM
If somehow the information did get on record back in the US you would give up certain rights like voting, firearms ownership, etc. If you work in any field that may require a security clearance, this would not be a wise thing to do.
#17
Posted 20 December 2007 - 11:14 PM
Artículo 37.
A) Ningún mexicano por nacimiento podrá ser privado de su nacionalidad.
La nacionalidad mexicana por naturalización se perderá en los siguientes casos:
I. Por adquisición voluntaria de una nacionalidad extranjera, por hacerse pasar en cualquier instrumento público como extranjero, por usar un pasaporte extranjero, o por aceptar o usar títulos nobiliarios que impliquen sumisión a un Estado extranjero, y
II. Por residir durante cinco años continuos en el extranjero.
C) La ciudadanía mexicana se pierde:
I. Por aceptar o usar títulos nobiliarios de gobiernos extranjeros;
II. Por prestar voluntariamente servicios oficiales a un gobierno extranjero sin permiso del Congreso Federal o de su Comisión Permanente;
III. Por aceptar o usar condecoraciones extranjeras sin permiso del Congreso Federal o de su Comisión Permanente;
IV. Por admitir del gobierno de otro país títulos o funciones sin previa licencia del Congreso Federal o de su Comisión Permanente, exceptuando los títulos literarios, científicos o humanitarios que pueden aceptarse libremente;
V. Por ayudar, en contra de la Nación, a un extranjero, o a un gobierno extranjero, en cualquier reclamación diplomática o ante un tribunal internacional, y
VI. En los demás casos que fijan las leyes.
#18
Posted 23 December 2007 - 05:17 PM
#19
Posted 22 January 2008 - 06:31 PM
I do believe you run the risk of losing your US citizenship since you are born in the USA. Is that of no concern to you ?
I know a US born man of MX born parents who lives in TJ with his MX born wife, but refuses to get his MX citizenship because of this fear.
I guess what I stated to Miggie above I would say here as well.
and with the intention to give up U.S. citizenship."
It's as clear as mud.
http://travel.state....s/cis_1753.html
I don't intend to give up US citizenship and if Mexico requires I sign a statement that says I do, I won't.
Yes, you could be wiser in not signing such a document.
If a USA born citizen wants a 2nd citizenship to another country,
it doesn't mean that this person's intention is to give up their US citizenship (even if the law requires it).
As Chiquito states below that MX affidavits must be signed promising such even though the US doesn't have to know about it. Sounds pretty iffy to me . . .. .
If somehow the information did get on record back in the US you would give up certain rights like voting, firearms ownership, etc. If you work in any field that may require a security clearance, this would not be a wise thing to do.
What you seem to be saying is that if the officials in your original country (the USA) don't know, the Mexican government won't tell them since it it isn't a normal policy (unless maybe they are asked to disclose such information). It sounds as though a person could be taking a risk if for some reason the information is provided to the officials of the other country.
If the only reason to change one's citizenship is property ownership without paying the annual fideicomiso fees, it could be thought of as a very serious decision.
Are there other reasons making it worth doing so ?
And I still ask those questions.
While having a citizenship of another country might seem attractive,
I suspect that in some ways it could have it's drawbacks if not all together backfiring with some serious consequences.
Honestly, I feel this subject is of vital neccessity to explore and to be made as clear as possible. I simply don't enough about it.
Sometimes I even wonder & speculate that certain laws are purposely made to be ambiguous in order to leave room for interpretation and perhaps some abuse.
:shock: :? :oops: :cry:
#20
Posted 22 January 2008 - 06:40 PM
But what do I know...
:wink:
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












