Jump to content


sycho

Member Since 05 Feb 2012
Offline Last Active Aug 23 2012 05:15 AM
-----

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Dollar accounts in Mexico

16 August 2012 - 05:31 PM

QUOTE (Daniel @ Aug 14 2012, 11:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
A man, who is a US citizen, planning on retiring in Mexico recently asked me some questions--which I'll pass along hoping for detailed answers. IMO his situation isn't as important as his questions which are:
1--Can he open a checking account in Mexico (to avoid the ups and downs associated with the exchange rate) in which his money is U.S. dollars.
2--Can he have direct deposits (for Social Security benefits, etc.) go into this account
3--How long after direct deposits are made into his Mexican checking account will the funds be available
4--Will he be able to write checks in dollars to businesses in the US. (For example, could he use the checking account to register a car in the US, rent a storage shed in the US, etc.)
5.--What documents are needed.
6--What Mexican banks offer this type of dollar accounts.

Thanks.

----------------

Please, I'd like to avoid responses asking why he doesn't use a US checking account, etc. I didn't go into that as it really isn't germane to his questions, but if you need a answer put it down to something like he won't be living near the border.


1--An FM2 or FM3 visa is needed to open a bank account in Mexico.
2--Direct deposit of Social Security benefits is available in Mexico according to https://www.socialse...ountrylist6.htm.
3--There would be no reason for funds deposited via direct deposit to not be available immediately as the transaction is completed when it happens (unlike a deposited check which requires additional steps to actually complete the transaction).
5--I would refer you to forums dealing with visa applications. I'm fairly certain the visa will get the account opened. To get the visa, though, stuff like 6 months worth of bank statements translated into Spanish (showing that the minimum income requirements are met), some sort of declaration, a utility bill or statement from a landlord or the like (showing residency), passport photos and the like are required.

In Topic: passport and visas

03 August 2012 - 11:23 PM

QUOTE (jose's marrido @ Jul 13 2012, 12:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
hi im new to this blog but hope it helps me figure out some things for sure smile.gif. My fiance is probably going to be deported and he wants us to live here in tijuana smile.gif. I have my passport and we are planning for me to work there in california of course but ive been reading a lot of different things about this and not sure whats true? i read that if i pay for the tourist card when i cross,i have to bring it to give them when i exit. But then ill have to pay for it again when i go home? i guess im worried about being able to live and do things there and work in cali. Help?


First, my apologies for you not receiving a reply earlier. I didn't even notice this post until today. I'm surprised nobody else replied earlier since it looks like you posted this question nearly three weeks ago. Anyhow...

I am not an expert on the issue, but I can share my limited knowledge. If you're only going as far as Tijuana, you do not need the tourist card unless you are staying longer than either 72 hours or one week (I've read both as the timeframe, though I've seen 72 hours more than one week). Assuming you would be leaving to go to work before the clock runs out, you definitely are not required to have one. That said, nobody cares how long you've been here. Even if they did, because no paperwork/identification is required to enter the country there really is no means of determining how long one has been here. As long as you're not planning to leave the tourist zone (I'm not sure how far south that extends, but Tijuana is definitely in it - I think it ends in BC somewhere around Ensenada but definitely don't take my word on that) or planning to get an FM3 or FM2 for some reason (like to get in on the national healthcare program), my advice would be just don't worry about a tourist card. Even if you do have a reason to get one, I would say don't turn it in every time you leave. Again, for the same reason - it's not required to re-enter, so nobody is going to know you're coming and going. I will stress, however, you should get one if you go south of the tourist zone as I have read they do have checkpoints and will fine you for venturing that far without one (or a visa).

Sorry to hear that the u.s. government is once again showing off its oppressive assholishness.

In Topic: Expats exempted from ACA?

14 July 2012 - 04:27 PM

One more update:

I finally heard back from a government lawyer yesterday. While he couldn't give me any advice because he only provides advice for members of congress, he did provide a couple of helpful tidbits. First, the actual laws can be found on the government printing office website (http://www.gpo.gov/). What one needs to search for are Public Law 111-148 (that's the PPACA) and Public Law 111-152 (that's the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act). The HCERA doesn't have anything to do with expats being subjected to the individual mandate. I just mention it because the original document I referenced was a consolidation of these two laws. The second tidbit the guy gave me was referring me to section 5000A(f)(4), which is indeed what I reprinted in part in my last post (part B referred to people living in u.s. possessions, so I didn't reprint it). So this post is just confirming that my last post did indeed include the actual language of the law, and I was looking at the applicable section.

In Topic: Expats exempted from ACA?

12 July 2012 - 10:44 PM

Okay. After receiving no help (not even a response) from the u.s. government and doing a fair amount of research, here is what I've come up with:

The individual mandate requires most Americans to
maintain “minimum essential” health insurance coverage.
26 U. S. C. §5000A. The mandate does not apply to some
individuals, such as prisoners and undocumented aliens.
§5000A(d). Many individuals will receive the required cover-
age through their employer, or from a government pro-
gram such as Medicaid or Medicare. See §5000A(f). But
for individuals who are not exempt and do not receive
health insurance through a third party, the means of
satisfying the requirement is to purchase insurance from a
private company.

source: http://www.supremeco.../11-393c3a2.pdf


‘‘CHAPTER 48—MAINTENANCE OF MINIMUM ESSENTIAL
COVERAGE
‘‘Sec. 5000A. Requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage.
‘‘SEC. 5000A. REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.

‘‘(f) MINIMUM  ESSENTIAL  COVERAGE .—For purposes of this section—

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘minimum essential coverage’
means any of the following:
‘‘(A) GOVERNMENT SPONSORED PROGRAMS.—Coverage
under—
‘‘(i) the Medicare program under part A of title
XVIII of the Social Security Act,

‘‘(4) INDIVIDUALS RESIDING OUTSIDE UNITED STATES OR RESIDENTS
OF TERRITORIES.—Any applicable individual shall be
treated as having minimum essential coverage for any month—
‘‘(A) if such month occurs during any period described
in subparagraph ( A ) or ( B ) of section 911(d)(1) which is
applicable to the individual, or

source: http://www.ncsl.org/...onsolidated.pdf


26 U.S.C. § 911 : US Code - Section 911: Citizens or residents of the United States living abroad

(d) Definitions and special rules
For purposes of this section -
(1) Qualified individual
The term "qualified individual" means an individual whose tax
home is in a foreign country and who is -
( A ) a citizen of the United States and establishes to the
satisfaction of the Secretary that he has been a bona fide
resident of a foreign country or countries for an uninterrupted
period which includes an entire taxable year, or
( B ) a citizen or resident of the United States and who,
during any period of 12 consecutive months, is present in a
foreign country or countries during at least 330 full days in
such period.

source: http://codes.lp.find...A/1/N/III/B/911


In a nutshell, the first part is excerpted from the Supreme Court's decision. It's telling me that I'm looking at the right part of the PPACA. It came directly from the Supreme Court's website, so I'm fairly confident it's the real decision. The second part is taken from the closest thing I could find to the actual text of the PPACA. It’s from the site of the National Conference of State Legislatures. It says in the title section that the document was prepared for the House Office of the Legislative Council for the use of its attorneys and clients, is not an official document of the House of Representatives, and should not be cited as “the law.” I think that’s more of a CYA statement, though, and I am reasonably confident that the sections I’ve cited are are actually in the law that was signed by the POTUS and upheld by the Supreme Court. The third part is from findlaw.com and cites law that has been on the books for some time. I’m fairly certain they got it right. I don’t think I need to comment on it any further because it self-explanatory. I just feel bad for people who expatriate after the first of next year as it looks like they could be screwed for as long as a year unless they are fortunate enough to be covered in some way such as having an employer covering them or Medicare Part A (that’s the free part).

There were other loopholes as well. I was concentrating on these because that was the information I was looking for. For example, there are exemptions if you don't need to file taxes, are on some other kind of government program, etc. There's something about American Indians. I just didn't research those angles because they weren't applicable to what I was looking at.

The bottom line is we're good as long as we are here for 330 each year or are bona fide residents for the entire tax year or have Medicare Part A.

In Topic: Not So New

08 July 2012 - 06:47 AM

Hey WInston, Cyanide and anyone else in Playas, wanna get together sometime to exchange info, ideas, etc. maybe over a cup of coffee or tacos or pizza or whatever? It's just an idea I thought might be worth tossing out there. There's a section on this site for singles, but I'm not looking for a hookup or anything like that - just maybe saying this has been my experience, what have you experienced? I'm new to this site and Playas too, but I know I could hold up my end of a conversation for at least 15 minutes with questions and observations. I know exchanging info and stuff is what this site is for, but there are things that are just easier to discuss face-to-face. For example, I'm not inclined to start a new thread anywhere on this site about my very specific bicycle problem, but I might waste 30 seconds of somebody's time to ask them a quick question if I think there's any hope of a useful response. We've probably already seen each other anyway, so why not be able to put a face to an internet nickname? We might even be able to discover ways to better utilize this site.