New "reverse" border inspections have begun ?
#1
Posted 19 October 2008 - 04:49 PM
Haven't experienced it myself but heard of the change on the radio.
If true, there will likely be all sorts of repercussions to be felt.
#2
Posted 19 October 2008 - 05:11 PM
I am now George Constanza - Lord of the idiots
#3
Posted 19 October 2008 - 06:02 PM
At all hours ?
#4
Posted 19 October 2008 - 09:17 PM
I now enter via the San Ysidro entry.
#5
Posted 19 October 2008 - 09:56 PM
I am now George Constanza - Lord of the idiots
#6
Posted 20 October 2008 - 12:01 AM
#7
Posted 29 October 2008 - 11:30 PM
They looked in my trunk, and did not ask for any documents, but this is a new occurance. I don't look shiffty, and with an older lady in the car, give me a break.
Both times it was in the middle of the day between noon and two p.m.
#8
Posted 30 October 2008 - 12:08 AM
They looked in my trunk, and did not ask for any documents, but this is a new occurance. I don't look shiffty, and with an older lady in the car, give me a break.
Both times it was in the middle of the day between noon and two p.m.
No red lights in 30 years ? That's amazing. With that kind of luck, I'd play blackjack.
If I'm not mistaken, I'd guess that the process is generally a mechanically random thing (unless somebody know otherwise).
#9
Posted 30 October 2008 - 12:33 AM
Luckily for me by the time i am getting to the border it is about 8:30pm. 3 lanes open, and so far i have not gotten a red light. The only thing they can find are my tools....
#10
Posted 31 October 2008 - 11:28 PM
I think that it would depend on who is stopping you. The officials of the US side or the Mexican side.
Maybe the US side is looking for someone in particular. Training exercises could be another. Change of policy another (for whatever reason they can dream up).
A political reason might be to show the public that they are doing something to justify budget allocations or being tough on criminals, etc.
A good reason for the Mexican side would simply be to help stem the flow of weapons from the US.
I've heard of Mexicans saying that it should have been a policy implemented a long time ago.
I'm sure plenty of people could argue that what flows out of the USA is far more dangerous than what get's in.
#11
Posted 03 November 2008 - 02:57 PM
If I'm not mistaken, I'd guess that the process is generally a mechanically random thing (unless somebody know otherwise).
They are doing it to check for firearms entering MX.
#12
Posted 03 November 2008 - 05:29 PM
About time something was done, but why is the US having to stop Mexican drug gangs from getting cheap guns??? I guess it is cheaper for Mexico to bitch to the US rather than enact their own inspections...
And why not let the Mexican citizens have legal guns? That would level the playing field if gangs/robbers could get shot by innocent civilians when attacked.
No, not a NRA member; just makes sense to me. Is the Mexican government that scarred of a full population armed revolt??? Maybe if they did a better job at governing they wouldn't be???
No, not Mexico bashing; I like it here; just that somethings could improve.
Time is what keeps everything from happening at once.
#13
Posted 17 April 2009 - 03:25 AM
I know, I know, people will get mad because it will make it harder and more time consuming, BUT I have news for ya.. its going to happen! My question is, WHO does it and who should pay for it?
And Yes, I would agree that the MX govt maybe scared to give citizens guns... Just like for years they were scared to even aloow them an education, untill just recently!
#14
Posted 17 April 2009 - 10:48 AM
#15
Posted 17 April 2009 - 11:31 AM
#16
Posted 17 April 2009 - 04:22 PM
#17
Posted 17 April 2009 - 11:20 PM
#18
Posted 18 April 2009 - 01:34 AM
Check this out!
Should I be surprised that you don't see this on main street media?
http://www.aclu.org/...onfreezone.html
Kind of like Mexico no warrant necessary just someone or some cop to say or think you may have drugs or what ever.
JM
#19
Posted 18 April 2009 - 01:40 AM
Dunno, Rich, do you really want to see as much of a back-up coming into Mexico as going out? Fact is, not every country is as fascist as the U.S. Once upon a time border controls were non-existent, for better or for worse. I've crossed into a number of countries without having to deal with the foolishness that we put up with in San Ysidro.
Um, read our federal constitution. Here in Mexico we don't want to foment the same environment that produced the revolution of 1910. Even so, what with Calderón, another revolution is fairly likely.
Again, read our federal constitution or a bit of our twentieth-century history. The "decena trágica" is not something we would care to revisit.
You would do better not to measure Mexico by a gringo yardstick. "Improve" is a subjective term. Mexico is what it is, take it or leave it. Personally, I suspect that Mexico has been sliding downhill ever since Lázaro Cárdenas left office. But all shall be well, according to Lady Juliana of Norwich, and all manner of thing shall be well. Why, we might even survive the current depravations of the neoliberales.
X
#20
Posted 18 April 2009 - 02:00 AM
X
xolotl
Dear Sir: Just a little confused what is neoliberales
This is what I found for a definition
Neroliberalism: A political orientation originating in the 1960s; blends liberal political views with an emphasis on economic growth
A person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties
A person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets
With minimally restricted freedom in commerce
Definition laissenz-faire:
With minimally restricted freedom in commerce
The doctrine that government should not interfere in commercial affairs
Like I said I am confused what is wrong with that?
JM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










